<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EMH brings you &#8211; Top five box office surprises so far of 2008.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geektyrant.com/2008/04/emh-brings-you-top-five-box-office-surprises-so-far-of-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geektyrant.com/2008/04/emh-brings-you-top-five-box-office-surprises-so-far-of-2008/</link>
	<description>Geek Movie and Entertainment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:11:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: E.M.H</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2008/04/emh-brings-you-top-five-box-office-surprises-so-far-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator>E.M.H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=22#comment-1300</guid>
		<description>Sheesh! I must look like such a moron. I find myself getting those two titles mixed up all the time. Sorry about that. Thanks for keeping me in line Mazer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheesh! I must look like such a moron. I find myself getting those two titles mixed up all the time. Sorry about that. Thanks for keeping me in line Mazer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazer</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2008/04/emh-brings-you-top-five-box-office-surprises-so-far-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1299</link>
		<dc:creator>Mazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=22#comment-1299</guid>
		<description>McConaughey is not in &quot;10 Things I Hate About You&quot; he is in &quot;How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McConaughey is not in &#8220;10 Things I Hate About You&#8221; he is in &#8220;How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2008/04/emh-brings-you-top-five-box-office-surprises-so-far-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1298</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=22#comment-1298</guid>
		<description>I agree with number 5. No one saw that coming. He had an amazing career in front of him. The Joker will have been his best performance, and we wont see him in another film again. 4. Matthew McConaughey is hit and miss with me. I really liked him in his earlier films. I will only see the movies he is in now if my wife wants to go. He is watchable, but he&#039;ll never win an oscar. 3. I agree with you on Harry Potter I also thought they should have been doing that all along. The studios could have doubled their money! 2. Vantage point was a pointless film. I loved every actor in that movie but the concept and story was annoying. By the 3rd &quot;Vantage Point&quot; the audience was laghing, by the 5th people started walking out of the theater or talking during the film. I can&#039;t belive it made that much money! These actors could have been used in a better film. 1. Cloverfield was a fun movie to watch. It was a popcorn movie. I enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with number 5. No one saw that coming. He had an amazing career in front of him. The Joker will have been his best performance, and we wont see him in another film again. 4. Matthew McConaughey is hit and miss with me. I really liked him in his earlier films. I will only see the movies he is in now if my wife wants to go. He is watchable, but he&#8217;ll never win an oscar. 3. I agree with you on Harry Potter I also thought they should have been doing that all along. The studios could have doubled their money! 2. Vantage point was a pointless film. I loved every actor in that movie but the concept and story was annoying. By the 3rd &#8220;Vantage Point&#8221; the audience was laghing, by the 5th people started walking out of the theater or talking during the film. I can&#8217;t belive it made that much money! These actors could have been used in a better film. 1. Cloverfield was a fun movie to watch. It was a popcorn movie. I enjoyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
