<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JJ Abrams Talks about Why William Shatner won&#8217;t be in the new Star Trek Movie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geektyrant.com/2008/09/jj-abrams-talks-about-why-william-shatner-wont-be-in-the-new-star-trek-movie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geektyrant.com/2008/09/jj-abrams-talks-about-why-william-shatner-wont-be-in-the-new-star-trek-movie/</link>
	<description>Geek Movie and Entertainment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:11:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2008/09/jj-abrams-talks-about-why-william-shatner-wont-be-in-the-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-2061</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=1724#comment-2061</guid>
		<description>*** SPOILER ALERT *** SPOILER ALERT *** SPOILER ALERT *** SPOILER ALERT ***


As I understand the leaked plot summary, the Romulans travel back and disrupt the time line, hence the story focuses on a young Kirk, Spock and company. Canon will be followed, but the time line disruption will also allow for some changes to canon to ripple forward, thus &quot;reviving&#039; the franchise, whatever that means.

Nimoy will cameo as old/&#039;present day&#039; Spock, who will somehow advise his younger self (Quinto) who will in turn thwart the Romulans. Kirk is dead &#039;at present&#039;. Shatner can not play his younger self, (duh!) so absent a worthless cameo as a nobody who was kicked out of Starfleet Academy for cheating decades ago, what role is there for Shatner?

Abrams has a singular opportunity to reset and restart the franchise. If this reset is successful then more movie (perhaps a return to TV), etc., if it fails then Trek is likely dead for decade or so.

Either way, Shatner is part of what was, not part of what is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*** SPOILER ALERT *** SPOILER ALERT *** SPOILER ALERT *** SPOILER ALERT ***</p>
<p>As I understand the leaked plot summary, the Romulans travel back and disrupt the time line, hence the story focuses on a young Kirk, Spock and company. Canon will be followed, but the time line disruption will also allow for some changes to canon to ripple forward, thus &#8220;reviving&#8217; the franchise, whatever that means.</p>
<p>Nimoy will cameo as old/&#8217;present day&#8217; Spock, who will somehow advise his younger self (Quinto) who will in turn thwart the Romulans. Kirk is dead &#8216;at present&#8217;. Shatner can not play his younger self, (duh!) so absent a worthless cameo as a nobody who was kicked out of Starfleet Academy for cheating decades ago, what role is there for Shatner?</p>
<p>Abrams has a singular opportunity to reset and restart the franchise. If this reset is successful then more movie (perhaps a return to TV), etc., if it fails then Trek is likely dead for decade or so.</p>
<p>Either way, Shatner is part of what was, not part of what is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trex</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2008/09/jj-abrams-talks-about-why-william-shatner-wont-be-in-the-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-2060</link>
		<dc:creator>Trex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=1724#comment-2060</guid>
		<description>@ rick

It was either he&#039;s in the movie and it focuses on him significantly, or he&#039;s not in the movie at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ rick</p>
<p>It was either he&#8217;s in the movie and it focuses on him significantly, or he&#8217;s not in the movie at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2008/09/jj-abrams-talks-about-why-william-shatner-wont-be-in-the-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-2062</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=1724#comment-2062</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get that he wanted the &quot;movie to focus on him significantly&quot; but he didn&#039;t want to be in it? wtf?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get that he wanted the &#8220;movie to focus on him significantly&#8221; but he didn&#8217;t want to be in it? wtf?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
