<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unfortunately Universal Pictures is Remaking Cronenberges VIDEODROME</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5269/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5269/</link>
	<description>Geek Movie and Entertainment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:11:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nikto</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5269/comment-page-1/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>nikto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=5269#comment-847</guid>
		<description>I think they should remake &quot;Rabid&quot; instead.

Much more timely, with swine flu &amp; all.

And they could dedicate it to Marilyn Chambers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should remake &#8220;Rabid&#8221; instead.</p>
<p>Much more timely, with swine flu &amp; all.</p>
<p>And they could dedicate it to Marilyn Chambers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fanboy Avenger</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5269/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fanboy Avenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=5269#comment-846</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what you guys are talking about. This is going to be great! All the updated CG and twists in storytelling that I am sure it&#039;s going to take. This will be a massive and epic film!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what you guys are talking about. This is going to be great! All the updated CG and twists in storytelling that I am sure it&#8217;s going to take. This will be a massive and epic film!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grammarian</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5269/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Grammarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=5269#comment-845</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but I have to correct the grammatical errors in your piece. They make a potentially great post painful to read.

&quot;because of there lack of originality&quot; should be &quot;their lack.&quot; &quot;There&quot; is an adverb, &quot;their&quot; means &quot;belongs to them.

&quot;Whats crazy is&quot; should be &quot;What&#039;s crazy is....&quot; &quot;What&#039;s&quot; = What is. The same is true of &quot;Lets.&quot; It should be &quot;Let&#039;s.&quot; &quot;Let&#039;s&quot; = Let us.

Finally, &quot;it’s awesomeness&quot; should be &quot;its awesomeness.&quot; &quot;It&#039;s&quot; = It is/It has. &quot;Its&quot; = belongs to it.

Having said all of this, I totally agree with you that remaking &lt;i&gt;Videodrome&lt;/i&gt; is a terrible idea. The story was appropriate for its era, when VHS and Betamax video technology were fairly new as a mass entertainment addition to television, but now the idea is anachronistic today. They need to think about the addictiveness and narcotic power of social networking software, like several unnamed sites/services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but I have to correct the grammatical errors in your piece. They make a potentially great post painful to read.</p>
<p>&#8220;because of there lack of originality&#8221; should be &#8220;their lack.&#8221; &#8220;There&#8221; is an adverb, &#8220;their&#8221; means &#8220;belongs to them.</p>
<p>&#8220;Whats crazy is&#8221; should be &#8220;What&#8217;s crazy is&#8230;.&#8221; &#8220;What&#8217;s&#8221; = What is. The same is true of &#8220;Lets.&#8221; It should be &#8220;Let&#8217;s.&#8221; &#8220;Let&#8217;s&#8221; = Let us.</p>
<p>Finally, &#8220;it’s awesomeness&#8221; should be &#8220;its awesomeness.&#8221; &#8220;It&#8217;s&#8221; = It is/It has. &#8220;Its&#8221; = belongs to it.</p>
<p>Having said all of this, I totally agree with you that remaking <i>Videodrome</i> is a terrible idea. The story was appropriate for its era, when VHS and Betamax video technology were fairly new as a mass entertainment addition to television, but now the idea is anachronistic today. They need to think about the addictiveness and narcotic power of social networking software, like several unnamed sites/services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urizon</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5269/comment-page-1/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>urizon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=5269#comment-844</guid>
		<description>You cite Kruger&#039;s authorship of &lt;i&gt;The Brothers Grimm&lt;/i&gt; as if it were something to be proud of. That movie was so bad, it was like a train crashing into a collapsing building, the rubble of which was then obliterated by an asteroid.

I think I&#039;ll skip this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cite Kruger&#8217;s authorship of <i>The Brothers Grimm</i> as if it were something to be proud of. That movie was so bad, it was like a train crashing into a collapsing building, the rubble of which was then obliterated by an asteroid.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll skip this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bil Zombie</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5269/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Bil Zombie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=5269#comment-843</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait to have a shiny, new, remade Videdrome dvd... for me to poop on. At least this will ensure the original makes it to blu-ray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait to have a shiny, new, remade Videdrome dvd&#8230; for me to poop on. At least this will ensure the original makes it to blu-ray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5269/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=5269#comment-842</guid>
		<description>Ten to one the remake will be rated PG-13. What&#039;s next - G-rated remakes of Midnight Cowboy and Taxi Driver?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ten to one the remake will be rated PG-13. What&#8217;s next &#8211; G-rated remakes of Midnight Cowboy and Taxi Driver?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Houchin</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5269/comment-page-1/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Houchin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=5269#comment-840</guid>
		<description>Worst thing I&#039;ve ever heard. Videodrome is one of my top 5 favorite films. I cite it in every media class I take, and half of it&#039;s power is how prophetic and original it was/is. Ehren Kruger will never conjure anything that will be just as powerful in 20 years as it is upon release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worst thing I&#8217;ve ever heard. Videodrome is one of my top 5 favorite films. I cite it in every media class I take, and half of it&#8217;s power is how prophetic and original it was/is. Ehren Kruger will never conjure anything that will be just as powerful in 20 years as it is upon release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maura McHugh</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5269/comment-page-1/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>Maura McHugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=5269#comment-841</guid>
		<description>Awful news. I just watched this one again recently, and it remains pertinent.

I can understand the impulse from only one point of view and that&#039;s because the technology in the original film is completely out of date.

However, that doesn&#039;t spoil my enjoyment of the film. I still love Coppola&#039;s The Conversation, and the tech in that film is dreadfully dated. The story, acting, and direction remain flawless, however.

Btw, Ehren Kruger is a man. It will remain to be seen if he can tackle this job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awful news. I just watched this one again recently, and it remains pertinent.</p>
<p>I can understand the impulse from only one point of view and that&#8217;s because the technology in the original film is completely out of date.</p>
<p>However, that doesn&#8217;t spoil my enjoyment of the film. I still love Coppola&#8217;s The Conversation, and the tech in that film is dreadfully dated. The story, acting, and direction remain flawless, however.</p>
<p>Btw, Ehren Kruger is a man. It will remain to be seen if he can tackle this job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: filmgeekben</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5269/comment-page-1/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>filmgeekben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=5269#comment-839</guid>
		<description>Wow, I never imagined that Cronenberg (who, ironically, made some amazing remakes himself) would end up being remade.  Videodrome?  It was and is such an amazing film.  This is such a stupid idea.  If it gets people to watch the original, that&#039;s cool, but please do not go see this remake.

I&#039;m sure Cronenberg is pleased...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I never imagined that Cronenberg (who, ironically, made some amazing remakes himself) would end up being remade.  Videodrome?  It was and is such an amazing film.  This is such a stupid idea.  If it gets people to watch the original, that&#8217;s cool, but please do not go see this remake.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Cronenberg is pleased&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
