<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robert Zemeckis wants to Make a Motion Capture ROGER RABBIT Sequel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5334/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5334/</link>
	<description>Geek Movie and Entertainment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:11:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zemeckis please retire</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5334/comment-page-1/#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator>Zemeckis please retire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 06:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=5334#comment-1032</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the stupidest thing I&#039;ve ever heard in my life. Okay the ridiculous idea is that the characters that he wants to mo cap are cartoon characters!  It doesn&#039;t make any sense because mo cap is supposed to capture realistic movements which is the complete opposite of cartoon movement. How the heck is an actor in a mocap suit going to jump six feet in the air and have his eyes bug out of his skull?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the stupidest thing I&#8217;ve ever heard in my life. Okay the ridiculous idea is that the characters that he wants to mo cap are cartoon characters!  It doesn&#8217;t make any sense because mo cap is supposed to capture realistic movements which is the complete opposite of cartoon movement. How the heck is an actor in a mocap suit going to jump six feet in the air and have his eyes bug out of his skull?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Adam</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5334/comment-page-1/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 02:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=5334#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>With all the advancements that Cameron has made while doing Avatar, mocap could look really impressive if/when this gets made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the advancements that Cameron has made while doing Avatar, mocap could look really impressive if/when this gets made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5334/comment-page-1/#comment-1030</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=5334#comment-1030</guid>
		<description>wow mocap is so passionate about this.... they must be an animator ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow mocap is so passionate about this&#8230;. they must be an animator <img src='http://geektyrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chiper</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5334/comment-page-1/#comment-1029</link>
		<dc:creator>Chiper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=5334#comment-1029</guid>
		<description>If this movie happens, it will only be because Zemeckis manages to make both Disney and Warner Bros happy.

In other words, it wont happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this movie happens, it will only be because Zemeckis manages to make both Disney and Warner Bros happy.</p>
<p>In other words, it wont happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mocap looks like dead meat</title>
		<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5334/comment-page-1/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Mocap looks like dead meat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektyrant.com/?p=5334#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>This man needs to be stopped! &quot;Performance Capture&quot; is not an advancement!  Why do you think Disney animators don&#039;t trace over live action footage?  Because it makes the characters look dead! Or being dragged around on meat hooks. Motion capture is only good in cases like Gollum or King Kong where animated characters need to exist along side live action characters. And in those cases animators are there, constantly massaging the motion capture to look right. There is no point in having an all motion-capture movie.  Zemeckis is just doing this so he only has to work 9-5.  Or so he can put the camera anywhere which is NOT a good idea.  (Who wants to see the camera shoved into the back of some screaming girl&#039;s throat?(Beowulf)).  Mo-crap can&#039;t top the 2-D animation done by Richard Williams and James Baxter in the original.  Nothing good can come of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This man needs to be stopped! &#8220;Performance Capture&#8221; is not an advancement!  Why do you think Disney animators don&#8217;t trace over live action footage?  Because it makes the characters look dead! Or being dragged around on meat hooks. Motion capture is only good in cases like Gollum or King Kong where animated characters need to exist along side live action characters. And in those cases animators are there, constantly massaging the motion capture to look right. There is no point in having an all motion-capture movie.  Zemeckis is just doing this so he only has to work 9-5.  Or so he can put the camera anywhere which is NOT a good idea.  (Who wants to see the camera shoved into the back of some screaming girl&#8217;s throat?(Beowulf)).  Mo-crap can&#8217;t top the 2-D animation done by Richard Williams and James Baxter in the original.  Nothing good can come of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
