The TRON Franchise Can’t Seem to Escape Its Own Circuit Loop

The Tron franchise has always fascinated me. It’s one of those sci-fi franchises that feels like it should be more of a massive success than it has been, a universe that explores fascinating concepts, packed with awesome visual style, wild ideas, and interesting storytelling.

Yet somehow, despite the awesomenss of the franchise, Tron has never quite managed to break free from the same cycle of criticism and box office disappointment.

I love these movies. Every single one of them. But man, being a Tron fan sometimes feels like defending a misunderstood digital underdog that just can’t catch a break.

Let’s start at the beginning with Tron (1982). Rotten Tomatoes score: 60%. Opening weekend: $4,761,795.

That’s not exactly the start of a blockbuster empire, but it’s also not terrible for a movie that was lightyears ahead of its time.

The thing is, most of the reviews from that era sound eerily familiar to the ones we’d read decades later.

Variety slammed it for being “loaded with visual delights but falls way short of the mark in story and viewer involvement.” The New York Times went even harder, calling the effects “loud, bright and empty,” and saying “they're all this movie has to offer.”

The Washington Post’s Gary Arnold said the visuals “don’t build dramatically,” and Jay Scott of The Globe and Mail summed it up as “a visionary technological achievement without vision.”

It’s like critics were amazed and annoyed at the same time, blown away by what they were seeing but frustrated that they didn’t feel anything.

This is the recurring theme with Tron. Every time Disney fires it up again, it’s the same pattern: incredible design, immersive sound, next-level effects, and a story that critics say doesn’t measure up.

Fast forward almost thirty years later to Tron: Legacy (2010). Rotten Tomatoes: 51%. Opening weekend: $44,026,211.

Fans like me were hyped. The Daft Punk soundtrack was an all-timer. The world looked jaw-droppingly cool. But once again, the reviews came in, and the déjà vu hit hard.

Film Threat said, “For all its visual snap, there’s no crackle to the story or pop to the characters.” Io9 called it “pointless,” saying it “feels like a computer in someone’s basement built for no purpose other than noodling on, twenty years ago.”

Newsday noted that “like the original, Tron: Legacy obsesses over technology and style but forgets important details like character and plot.” Film.com nailed the familiar refrain: “All digital dazzle and little substance.” And the LA Times twisted the neon knife one more time, “Unfortunately, there's not nearly enough new life.”

It’s kind of amazing how similar the complaints are. Almost three decades later, and critics were still seeing the Tron world as a beautiful shell with no heart inside. It’s as if every review could be copied and pasted from 1982 with a few tech updates.

Then came Tron: Ares. The film opened with $33,500,000 and sits at 56% on Rotten Tomatoes.

And guess what? The reviews sound like we’re living in a time loop. SlashFilm wrote, “There are several tantalizing sci-fi ideas within Tron: Ares that the filmmakers aren't the least bit interested in exploring.”

New York Magazine added, “Mostly, when you watch Tron: Ares, you become aware of the degree to which this franchise has exhausted its own metaphor.”

And The Playlist hit it with: “It’s big, blinding, and bursting with phosphorescent spectacle. Unfortunately, beneath the neon surface lies a script so hollow even AI might reject it for lack of substance.”

So here we are again, same damn criticisms, same frustrations, same glowing circuits. It’s wild how consistent it all is. Every time a Tron movie drops, it’s met with this push-pull between awe and apathy.

And yet, I can’t help but love these movies. Every time I rewatch Tron and Tron: Legacy I’m reminded of how special this franchise could be if it just clicked with more people. It’s crazy to mae that this franchise is bigger and more successful!

The world of Tron has so much potential and I personally think that it reaches that potential with its storytelling, philosophy, stimulating visuals, digital gods, and pixelated existentialism wrapped in synth and light. It’s geek awesomeness!

But for most audiences, it seems like the franchise just can’t bridge that emotional gap between the screen and the heart.

Maybe that’s part of its charm though. Tron is the cult classic that keeps getting big-budget sequels some people didn’t ask for but some of us desperately wanted. It’s the cinematic equivalent of a glowing, glitchy dream that refuses to fade, no matter how many times the system tries to reboot it.

I’ll always be plugged into the grid, even if the rest of the world never logs on.

GeekTyrant Homepage