Warner Bros. Discovery Rejects Paramount’s $108 Billion Bid, Stands Firm Behind Netflix Deal
Warner Bros. Discovery has officially shut the door on Paramount and Skydance, rejecting their $108 billion acquisition bid and make it clear the offer doesn’t come close to matching the value or certainty of its pending deal with Netflix.
The company’s board unanimously advised shareholders to reject Paramount Skydance’s $30 per share tender offer, calling it inadequate, risky, and ultimately inferior to the Netflix agreement already in place.
That deal would see Netflix acquire the Warner Bros. film and television studios, HBO, and HBO Max for $27.75 per share following WBD’s planned Q3 2026 spin-off of Discovery Global, which will house the company’s legacy TV networks.
In a sharply worded letter to shareholders filed with the SEC, the board said: “The terms of the Netflix merger are superior. The PSKY offer provides inadequate value and imposes numerous, significant risks and costs on WBD,” adding that the Paramount Skydance proposal does not qualify as a “Superior Proposal” under the Netflix merger agreement.
A major issue is financing. According to the board, Paramount has repeatedly claimed its bid was fully backstopped by the Ellison family. WBD flatly disputes that. “Paramount has consistently misled WBD shareholders that its proposed transaction has a ‘full backstop’ from the Ellison family. It does not, and never has.”
The board highlighted that Paramount’s latest proposal includes a $40.65 billion equity commitment “for which there is no Ellison family commitment of any kind. Instead, they propose that you rely on an unknown and opaque revocable trust for the certainty of this crucial deal funding.”
“Despite having been told repeatedly by WBD how important a full and unconditional financing commitment from the Ellison family was — and despite their own ample resources, as well as multiple assurances by PSKY during our strategic review process that such a commitment was forthcoming — the Ellison family has chosen not to backstop the PSKY offer.”
The board added that a revocable trust is “no replacement for a secured commitment by a controlling stockholder” since its assets and liabilities aren’t publicly disclosed and can change at any time.
WBD also stressed that Paramount’s offer lacks the binding protections of a merger agreement. According to the board, the proposal “can be terminated or amended by PSKY at any time prior to its completion.” The conclusion was blunt: “The PSKY offer is illusory.”
Cost-cutting projections were another red flag. Paramount has claimed a combined Paramount-Skydance-WBD operation could generate $9 billion in synergies. WBD pushed back hard, saying, “These targets are both ambitious from an operational perspective and would make Hollywood weaker, not stronger.” By comparison, Netflix has projected $2 billion to $3 billion in synergies tied to its acquisition.
WBD chair Samuel Di Piazza Jr. backed the board’s position in a statement, saying: “Following a careful evaluation of Paramount’s recently launched tender offer, the Board concluded that the offer’s value is inadequate, with significant risks and costs imposed on our shareholders.
“This offer once again fails to address key concerns that we have consistently communicated to Paramount throughout our extensive engagement and review of their six previous proposals. We are confident that our merger with Netflix represents superior, more certain value for our shareholders and we look forward to delivering on the compelling benefits of our combination.”
Netflix was quick to respond, welcoming the board’s recommendation and reaffirming its confidence in the deal. Co-CEO Ted Sarandos said: “The Warner Bros. Discovery Board reinforced that Netflix’s merger agreement is superior and that our acquisition is in the best interest of stockholders.
“This was a competitive process that delivered the best outcome for consumers, creators, stockholders and the broader entertainment industry.”
Co-CEO Greg Peters added: “By acquiring Warner Bros., we’ll be able to offer audiences and creators around the world even more choice, value and opportunity. This transaction is fundamentally pro-consumer, pro-innovation, pro-creator and pro-growth.”
Paramount’s bid followed months of increasingly aggressive offers from David Ellison, starting at $19 per share in September and topping out at $30 earlier this month. After WBD selected Netflix, Skydance went directly to shareholders with a hostile tender offer. The board’s rejection now leaves Ellison and his backers, including his father Larry Ellison, to decide whether they’re willing to come back with something stronger.
Regulatory risk also loomed over Paramount’s proposal. Earlier versions of the bid were backed by sovereign wealth funds from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Abu Dhabi, along with Jared Kushner’s Affinity Partners, raising concerns about a potential national security review.
While those investors agreed to forgo governance rights and Affinity has since exited the bid entirely, WBD said it sees no meaningful difference in regulatory risk between a Paramount deal and the Netflix merger, despite Paramount’s claims to the contrary.
There’s also disagreement over valuation. Paramount argues WBD is overestimating the value of its TV networks business, which is excluded from the Netflix deal. But analysts at MoffettNathanson have noted that at lower leverage, the spun-off Discovery Global could be worth enough that the Netflix deal plus the network valuation would exceed $30 per share.
For now, Warner Bros. Discovery is standing firm. The board has made its choice, and unless Paramount Skydance comes back with a significantly improved and fully backed offer, the path forward appears firmly aligned with Netflix.
Here’s the full letter:
Dear Fellow Shareholders,
As your Board of Directors, we are committed to acting in your best interest. In this spirit, in October, we launched a public review of strategic alternatives to maximize shareholder value. This followed three separate proposals from Paramount Skydance (“PSKY”), as well as interest from multiple other parties.
That thorough process, overseen by the Board with the assistance of independent financial and legal advisors, as well as our management team, led to the company entering into a merger agreement with Netflix on December 4, with the substantial benefits to WBD shareholders described below. Having failed to submit the best proposal for you, our shareholders, PSKY launched an offer nearly identical to its most recently rejected proposal.
As a Board, we have now conducted another review and determined that PSKY’s tender offer remains inferior to the Netflix merger. The Board continues to unanimously recommend the Netflix merger, and that you reject the PSKY offer and not tender your shares.
Below, and in more detail in our 14D-9 filing, we highlight the many reasons for the Board’s determination. None of these reasons will be a surprise to PSKY given our clear, and oft- repeated, feedback on their six prior proposals.
The terms of the Netflix merger are superior. The PSKY offer provides inadequate value and imposes numerous, significant risks and costs on WBD.
The value we have secured for shareholders through the Netflix merger is extraordinary by any measure.
Our agreement with Netflix gives WBD shareholders $23.25 in cash, plus $4.50 in shares of Netflix common stock (based on a collar range of $97.91 – $119.67 in the Netflix stock price at the Ume of closing), plus the additional value of the shares of Discovery Global and the opportunity to participate in future potential upside following Discovery Global’s separation from WBD. The entire Board is confident in our recommendation that Netflix represents the best value-creating path for shareholders.
PSKY has consistently misled WBD shareholders that its proposed transaction has a “full backstop” from the Ellison family. It does not, and never has.
PSKY’s most recent proposal includes a $40.65 billion equity commitment, for which there is no Ellison family commitment of any kind. Instead, they propose that you rely on an unknown and opaque revocable trust for the certainty of this crucial deal funding. Despite having been told repeatedly by WBD how important a full and unconditional financing commitment from the Ellison family was – and despite their own ample resources, as well as multiple assurances by PSKY during our strategic review process that such a commitment was forthcoming – the Ellison family has chosen not to backstop the PSKY offer.
And a revocable trust is no replacement for a secured commitment by a controlling stockholder. The assets and liabilities of the trust are not publicly disclosed and are subject to change. As the name indicates, revocable trusts typically have provisions allowing for assets to be moved at any time. And the documents provided by PSKY for this conditional commitment contain gaps, loopholes and limitations that put you, our shareholders, and our company at risk.
Amplifying the concerns about the credibility of the equity commitment being offered by PSKY, the revocable trust and PSKY have agreed that the trust’s liability for damages, even in the case of a willful breach, would be capped at 7% of its commitment ($2.8 billion on a $108.4 billion transaction). Of course, the damage to WBD and its stockholders were the trust or PSKY to breach their obligations to close a transaction would likely be many multiples of this amount.
WBD’s merger agreement with Netflix is a binding agreement with enforceable commitments, with no need for any equity financing and robust debt commitments. The Netflix merger is fully backed by a public company with a market cap in excess of $400 billion with an investment grade balance sheet. The debt financing for the PSKY bid relies on an unsecure revocable trust commitment as well as the credit worthiness of a $15 billion market cap company with a credit rating at or only a notch above “junk” status from the two leading rating agencies. The financial condition and creditworthiness of PSKY, which, if its proposed transaction were to close, would have a high gross leverage ratio of 6.8x 2026E debt to EBITDA with virtually no current free cash flow generation before synergies, raise substantial risks for its acquisition of WBD. Such debt levels reflect a risky capital structure that is vulnerable to even potentially small changes in the PSKY or WBD business between signing and closing.
Additionally, PSKY contemplates $9 billion in synergies from the mergers of Paramount/Skydance and their offer for WBD. These targets are both ambitious from an operational perspective and would make Hollywood weaker, not stronger.
The Board’s review was full, transparent and competitive – establishing a level playing field that fostered a rigorous and fair process.
The Board repeatedly engaged with all parties, including extensive engagement with PSKY and its advisors over the course of nearly three months. We held dozens of calls and meetings with its principals and advisors including four in-person meetings and meals between David Zaslav and David and/or Larry Ellison and provided multiple opportunities for PSKY to offer a proposal that was superior to those of the other bidders, which PSKY never did.
After each bid, we informed PSKY of the material deficiencies and offered potential solutions. Despite this feedback, PSKY has never submitted a proposal that is superior to the Netflix merger agreement.
Despite PSKY’s media statements to the contrary, the Board does not believe there is a material difference in regulatory risk between the PSKY offer and the Netflix merger.
The Board carefully considered the federal, state, and international regulatory risks for both the Netflix merger and the PSKY offer with its regulatory advisors. The Board believes that each transaction is capable of obtaining the necessary U.S. and foreign regulatory approvals and that any difference between the respective regulatory risk levels is not material. The Board also notes that Netflix has agreed to a record-setting regulatory termination cash fee of $5.8 billion, significantly higher than PSKY’s $5 billion break fee.
The PSKY offer is illusory.
The offer can be terminated or amended by PSKY at any time prior to its completion; it is not the same thing as a binding merger agreement. The first paragraph of the offer states it is “subject to the conditions set forth in this offer to purchase (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time)” and continues on the next page, “we reserve the right to amend the Offer in any respect (including amending the Offer Price)”. In addition, the offer is not capable of being completed by its current expiration date, due to the need for, among other things, global regulatory approvals, which PSKY indicates may take 12-18 months. Nothing in this structure offers WBD shareholders any deal certainty.
The PSKY offer provides an untenable degree of risk and potential downside for WBD shareholders.
There will be additional costs associated with PSKY’s offer that could impact shareholders.
When considering the PSKY offer at this juncture, it is important to note that its acceptance could incur significant additional costs to shareholders – all of which PSKY has ignored in their communications. WBD would have to pay Netflix a $2.8 billion termination fee, which PSKY has not offered to reimburse. In addition, WBD would incur approximately $1.5 billion in financing costs if we do not complete our planned debt exchange as agreed to with certain of our debtholders, which would not be permitted by the PSKY offer. This additional $4.3 billion in potential costs represents approximately $1.66 per share to be borne by WBD shareholders if the offer does not close.
We look forward to moving ahead with our combination with Netflix and delivering the compelling and certain value it will create for shareholders. We urge you to carefully read the 14D-9 filed with the SEC this morning and available on our website, which more fully details the strategic review process and the Board’s reasons for its recommendation to you.
Sincerely,
The Warner Bros. Discovery Board of Directors
Via: Deadline